Discussion in 'Pro-Liberal Discussions' started by amberbeer, Sep 28, 2016.
So you still think Reagan's tax cuts caused the recession or nah?
It was Reagan not "Reagon"(proving you know nothing about the man or his Presidency other than liberal rewriting history), learn to spell. Nice revision of history. You may want to do a little bit of research before you open your mouth and make yourself look stupid like Fuzzy does all of the time.
I don't remember saying that. I recall the early 80s recession and talking about post hoc fallacies.
I do recall saying it caused massive budget deficits.
At the end of the day, Squealer, I'm waiting for proof that supply side works. Reagan isn't it.
Krugman is a socialist. Obama won the Nobel peace prize just for being elected when he hadn't done anything to deserve it (btw - still waiting for him do do something to earn that prize). Do you really want to give credit to any Nobel prize when they have already lost all credibility?
this is pretty damn petty.
take your post about not being able to spell peoples names and apply it to yourself.
Krugman is a Nobel Laureate economist and you don't get to dismiss his expertise. Still cannot quote the salient portion of the article I see.
Cognitive dissonance is reaching epic proportion here.
I am sorry my phone misspelled it, one letter automatically disqualifies me from knowledge.
Then I was wrong.
No biggie. My points about the recession persisting regardless and the recovery being typical still stand.
Still waiting for proof of supply side success.
Krugman isn't worthy of even speaking Reagan's name nor or you. I corrected my spelling mistake BTW.
Good for you, Fuzzy.
I was picking with you on the misspelling but it is your actual lack of knowledge that discredits you.
You actually going to add anything constructive or you just going to stick with the sophomoric diatribe?
You going to address my points or just fixate on the one point you think you can win as you usually do?
@Alex_P_Keaton has already proved you wrong. Why should we do it twice? Do you really want to be proven wrong twice?
All because I disagree with you politically I am without knowledge. Gotcha.
Recession of 1981–82 - A detailed essay on an important event in the history of the Federal Reserve.
WGBH American Experience . Reagan | PBS
No you are without knowledge do to being without knowledge. Read the post by @Alex_P_Keaton. He has owned Fuzzy in any thread about this subject. Why should I keep kicking that dead horse when it died long ago. I am sorry that you are naive about this. It is a disadvantage for you!
Now the Fed killing inflation caused the recession no doubt about it but supply side only served to worsen it.
He won on a single point of fact. We're discussing the effectiveness of supply side not whether or not supply side caused the 1981 recession. Just stop being a child.
If I change the post in question to Reagan's tax cuts worsened the recession then he hasn't 'owned' anything.