Proof Positive Hillary Knew She Received Classified Emails

Discussion in 'Pro-Conservative Discussions' started by jchap2k, Sep 26, 2016.

  1. jchap2k

    jchap2k Well-Known Member

    110 Messages
    63 Likes Received
    It is a well known fact to anyone who does any classified work that any email sent by our president is born classified. It has now come to light that Obama also lied about not knowing about the server, and was found to have been sending emails to Hillary from the get go under a pseudonym to avoid using his real email/name, as found from the latest FBI document dump. Hillary would, unless she were beyond incompetent, know with certainty that emails from that assumed name were classified, and responses to those emails would also be classified.

    Obama Reportedly Used Pseudonym To Email With Clinton On Her Private Server

    This is a major development, though nothing will come of it, as it explains why the FBI seemingly messed up the investigation so badly. It was not Hillary that Obama's DOJ was trying to protect. He doesn't like her. It was himself, and the lie that he told. I find it amazing that more was not made of this. I have heard some in the MSM say it was the republicans who leaked the information so they were in the wrong, but not a single person have I heard try to defend what Obama and Hillary did.
     
    Inferno2ss and JoeKing like this.
  2. Nelson

    Nelson Well-Known Member

    740 Messages
    458 Likes Received
    The liberals end the liberal media do not care . Morals and ethics are not a consideration when discussing Hillary, so they ignore it.
     
    JoeKing likes this.
  3. FuzzyLumpkins

    FuzzyLumpkins Well-Known Member

    3,038 Messages
    451 Likes Received
    Yeah the 'liberal media' hasn't covered the emails. :rolleyes:
     
  4. Heelsboy

    Heelsboy Well-Known Member

    271 Messages
    79 Likes Received
    There is no liberal bias, it's all corporate bias. There are only a handful of corporations that own all of the MSM outlets and they control the information that is reported.


    Now when facts get in the way of feelings, then the cries of liberal bias ring loud.
     
    FuzzyLumpkins likes this.
  5. JoeKing

    JoeKing Well-Known Member

    3,132 Messages
    1,302 Likes Received
    I'll remind you when you are in a pro-conservative forum you will restrain your inclinations to denigrate conservative leaning viewers as "weak-minded".
     
  6. amberbeer

    amberbeer Banned

    850 Messages
    104 Likes Received
    Just speaking the truth. You've denigrated me many times in the proliberal forum you hypocrite.
     
    FuzzyLumpkins likes this.
  7. jchap2k

    jchap2k Well-Known Member

    110 Messages
    63 Likes Received
    You do understand that the source of information in the story is from the FBI, not fabricated lies. You can be upset about a story, or who wrote the story, or who hosted the story, but try to not just ignore the fact that the source of the story is from a VERY credible source. Just because it is damaging to the narrative of innocence does not mean facts can be ignored.
     
    JoeKing likes this.
  8. amberbeer

    amberbeer Banned

    850 Messages
    104 Likes Received
    You do understand that the FBI determined that she did nothing illegal?
     
  9. jchap2k

    jchap2k Well-Known Member

    110 Messages
    63 Likes Received
    Incorrect: They said they did not think they could prosecute successfully. That does not imply innocence.
     
    Nelson and JoeKing like this.
  10. jchap2k

    jchap2k Well-Known Member

    110 Messages
    63 Likes Received
    How many times were members of the mafia/drug cartels unable to be prosecuted successfully due to insufficient evidence/witnesses? Does that mean they also did no crimes?
     
    JoeyBoy718, Nelson and JoeKing like this.
  11. amberbeer

    amberbeer Banned

    850 Messages
    104 Likes Received
    That means they didn't have any evidence so she is innocent. SMH.
     
  12. jchap2k

    jchap2k Well-Known Member

    110 Messages
    63 Likes Received
     
  13. jchap2k

    jchap2k Well-Known Member

    110 Messages
    63 Likes Received
    They had a huge amount of evidence, they just played with precedence and claimed that while laws were broken, there was no provable intent.

    It was clear she broke laws, they just didn't proceed. For that reason, she is not innocent, she is just not getting tried. She just claimed ignorance and memory losses to get off.

    (As can be inferred from the released FBI 302s. )
     
    JoeKing likes this.
  14. FuzzyLumpkins

    FuzzyLumpkins Well-Known Member

    3,038 Messages
    451 Likes Received
    They at no point was said laws were broken. If anything Comey was very careful to not use terms that were in laws that could be construed as being illegal actions.
     
  15. amberbeer

    amberbeer Banned

    850 Messages
    104 Likes Received
    Anger issues? Please don't beat your wife or kids. Please.
     
  16. Nelson

    Nelson Well-Known Member

    740 Messages
    458 Likes Received
    You ability to to tell the truth went out the window when you said there is no liberal bias in the media.
     
  17. Nelson

    Nelson Well-Known Member

    740 Messages
    458 Likes Received
    Comey is enough trouble as it is due to this situation.
     
  18. Nelson

    Nelson Well-Known Member

    740 Messages
    458 Likes Received
    Far from it. Not having the evidence has nothing to do with her guilt. OJ
    was a guilty man, but the evidence did not lead the jury to that verdict.
     
  19. JoeKing

    JoeKing Well-Known Member

    3,132 Messages
    1,302 Likes Received
    Just because that's what you do when you're angry doesn't mean that's my outlet when angry.
     
    Nelson likes this.
  20. Heelsboy

    Heelsboy Well-Known Member

    271 Messages
    79 Likes Received
    Instead of a one liner, provide some proof of this liberal bias.
     

Share This Page